Exposed to the elements of globalization in terms of dialects, cuisines, culture and fashion- our country has expanded its boundaries in all dimensions. We have come out from the closets of tradition to embrace the contemporary. In the process, we have progressed through many avenues, creating milestones that have added feathers to our cap.
The leap ahead and the fall backwards
Ostensible as the progress may be, it has not encompassed the society as a whole. The mindset of the Indian is still grappling with the transition; while being stuck in the clichés, norms, rigidity of the societal framework. The divide(in all planes), the disparity, the gender-bias manifest with its ugly face. They act on polar opposites, like the male and female of the species, who never conjoin and eventually threaten to tear the world asunder.
The male, the female and the clichés
The crux of the issue originates in the male/female of thought and action, the discrimination and prejudices, associated with the female, that has never evolved with the changing times. Women, like in olden times, are still bound by the confines of the societal rules, which were veiled behind blind-beliefs/superstitions/heirloom traditional practices.
Dress-sense- The crust- to-core mismatch with the male-sensibility
As, we the women, step out from behind the veils, to the new era of education, emancipation and empowerment, there is more than wolf-calls that we battle against. We confront the hybrid and hypocritical Indian male’s mindset- the typical being the much debatable dress-codes and their provocative aspects. Here is how the jagged male territory operates with respect to the dressing of its female counterparts, who are objectified suitably for violating their own modesty:
- Low necks and deep neck: . Forget the sweltering heat, which scorch during the peak of summer or the dire need to go airy. Our need for oxygen by not being strait-jacketed, doesn’t sync-up with the male’s perception of low-necks. For them, it is one bend farther from what “cleaves” the “buxom” from the “slate”, the “laced” from the “un-laced” and natural from the subterfuges. Our notion of feeling free is neck-tied by males, who only view neck-deep
- Low waist & Low hip: The curves, the midriff and the belly-button accentuate femininity. But not so for everyone. Where our intentions would be to streamline these naturally feminine with the latest in fashion, the typical male mind would be tuning to numbers of the hip and hop; to jive and dive(towards the nearest possible and grab-able mate). Not to mention, the whole get-up being imagined in the wild wind or under heavy downpour, and romance coming live in filmy style.
- The see-through and the shorts: While we emphasize on transparent relationships, we demote the wearing of transparent clothing. According to aged wisdom “the transparent” is worse than nudeness and in the eyes of the male – its sheer waste of clothing and draping- may as well have been….done without(Come to think of it, trying a new fabric which doesn’t confirm to modesty can send the scandal sheets running up to pages). As for shorts, whether it is several inches or feet above the knee – it is something showy and has to be gawked at. This is when the male (even the one with least poetic sensibility) takes flight with vivid imagery. Soulful expressions fill the air with regard to how the revealed legs are – from the hairy-scary to silken smooth; potato to pineapples legs and the rare slim ‘n’ slender, there is never a time, when shorts fall short of running commentary() . Short-skirts with a nice flare are no less than a treat for riveted eyeballs and open-mouthed drool, one that would have given Marlyn Munroe a run for her money.
The shameless, the shamed or the shameful?
Provocative, vulgar, obscene…the classification of immodest clothing can go on. Nevertheless, it doesn’t justify the objectification of women for satiating the male.
It is not just the male eyes, which keep ogling at the “immodest”. This expanse of the regressive-minded covers the old school of thought as well, which include women, who tut-tut even at a seven year old wearing cycling shorts, or discuss in hushed tones about the other “female” who has no sense about her flab, while flaunting it with “boldness”.
Dressing up or dressing down
What fails to be understood is that the concept of Dress-sense too has evolved from being the mere layer to cover up nudeness to representing one’s individuality. Just, as women are no longer the female of the species who hang around for mating calls and settles down for mothering the litter of her mate. What is revealed or what is concealed is entirely one’s individual choice, as long as the tastes are in sync with the occasion. Of course, a string bikini would be as much odd at a wedding function as an empress clothing for a beach party. Or, to suit the hypocritical standards of the otherwise men, you can’t be donned in the traditional 9-yards saris in the confines of a kitchen and burst out open in a flimsy chiffon material, to the night club. There has to be a bit of balance between individual and society; tradition and modernity and, especially in the bi-polarized mindset of the Indian male, which views “other” women as objects of desire, while seeking to keep their own female brethren behind veils of protection.
Should we be mummified remains of the janitor-society?
Stepping out strait-jacketed is not going to stop the wolf-whistling(who knows even strait-jackets may have loopholes only visible to the scanning eyes of a man). Nor is it going to reform the way the male thinks of the female. On the contrary, head-to-toe cover-up(like the Egyptian mummies) only incite the roving eyes to probe further, to dig deeper to see as to what could be beneath those layers. To combat the male dominance and the chauvinistic attitude of the society, both the male and the female of the human species should reorient their mindset to the evolving, the emerging and the empowering role of women in the modern scenario. After all, we have come a long way from: stark nakedness to modesty, animal hides to chic clothing, mating to companionship, the male to the manly…should it then take much time, thought and space for a perspective shift from a female to the woman?